The Sabarimala case was one of the most socially and legally contested rulings in India’s recent history. At issue was the restriction on women of menstruating age (10–50 years) from entering the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. The practice was challenged as discriminatory and unconstitutional. A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in a majority ruling, held that the ban violated the fundamental rights of women under Articles 14, 15, 19, and 25. The Court declare

The landmark Puttaswamy judgment recognized privacy as a fundamental right, forever changing the legal landscape in India. Since 2017,...

The Vineet Narain case is a landmark in India’s fight against corruption and for judicial activism. Triggered by delays and alleged...

The Mohd. Hanif Quareshi case is a pioneering judgment that fundamentally shaped minority rights in India, particularly the right of...

The landmark judgment in R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu laid the foundation for recognizing the right to privacy as a fundamental...